Federal and State Energy Policy
Federal and State Energy Policy








Tangled Wires
Municipal utilities are in many ways unregulated, other than being responsible to their city councils, or boards of directors for the Irrigation Districts, and having their decisions subject to challenge in court. They set their own rates, do all their own planning, conduct their own environmental reviews for smaller power plants and most transmission projects, and make all decisions concerning whether and what to build, and who to buy power from. Regulated utilities, such as PG&E and SoCal Edison, must get approval from a government agency for all of those things.
There are a few exceptions, in that municipal utilities must go through other agencies for licenses for certain types of power plants. In California, all "thermal" power plants 50 megawatts (MW) or larger must go through the California Energy Commission's licensing process. Thermal power plants are those that use a heat source to make power, including fossil fuels, geothermal, and biomass.

The one exception to all these jurisdictions are power plants built by the federal government, which other than hydro projects are few and far between. The Bureau of Reclamation conducts its own environmental review of all the federal hydroelectric projects it operates. The transmission lines built for federal projects are generally owned by one of four power marketing administrations, with the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) owning all federal lines in the Western US except those in Washington and Oregon, which are owned by the Bonneville Power Administration. WAPA conducts its own environmental review for the projects it builds.
Municipal utilities can conduct their own environmental review for all in-state transmission projects, though often some additional review is required for interconnections and shared facilities, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process required for TANC's interconnections with WAPA's facilities. Interstate lines are the jurisdiction of FERC.
In California, all transmission owners, including the municipal utilities, can chose to participate in the transmission system planning process and/or control area operation offered by the California Independent System Operator (CalISO). The state's investor-owned utilities are required to go through the CalISO's processes. To date, no municipal utility has chosen to enter the ISO's transmission planning process, and only a few very small municipal utilities have chosen the ISO as their control area operator. (The control area operator has physical control of the transmission system, and operates it to accommodate all scheduled power deliveries from power plant to distribution system.)

Explore the Issues
(sitemap)
Our mission. Our Vision.
Discussion about the relative benefits of distributed vs. centralized Energy Generation.
Energy Policy
Discussion of US Department of Energy and California's Energy Policy.
Our Discussion of the TANC Transmission Project.
Event, Schedules, Historical Documents.
A large collections of weblinks, documents, graphs and photos.
Errors? Omissions? Please email us your comments.